UAH Temperature Anomalies Following Predictable Pattern

In this post I show one simple  and 2 multiple regression models to assess the role of time, El Nino – La Nina SSTA and volcanic activity (SATO) on UAH global temperature anomaly trends. The 3rd model provides a reasonable  approximation of the actual UAH oscillations over the 1979 – Feb, 2011 period.

Click Image to Enlarge

This analysis is similar to previous temperature anomaly regressions (here, here, here) that I have done.

The simple trend line regression shows the overall trend is upward, however, there are several oscillations that the linear trend misses.  The yr_frac and Nino34 regression improves on the linear model, however, it undershoots in the early 1980s,  overshoots in the 1992-1994 period, periods following significant volcanic activity.

The yr_frac, Nino34 and SATO model improves the fit in the early 1980s and 1992-1994 period and is slightly better in the 1998 and 2010 El Nino periods.

The 3rd model matches the observed 2010 El Nino – La Nina oscillation pretty well so far, indicating that the 2010 – 2011 UAH anomalies are following a predictable pattern.

About these ads

6 responses to “UAH Temperature Anomalies Following Predictable Pattern

  1. hi….lucky enough to find your website in searching for sea surface temperature(SST) pattern. Just wondering why we should looking into anomalies pattern rather than the true values of SST. Any explanation?

    Cheers

  2. Steve Fitzpatrick

    Very nice work. I don’t see an R-squared value, but the model looks very good indeed.
    Tamino has done something similar, but used a different index for ENSO… and (surprise!) concluded that the underlying trend is much greater than what you found. It is pretty clear that the lagged Nino 3.4 index is a good predictor of short term trends.

  3. Pretty cool. It would be interesting if you could “project” out ahead to the extent of the Nino lag (5 months?), either without the SATO or assuming no substantial volcanic forcings.

  4. Hi, have you any comments on the presence of autocorrelation in the data – does this carry the risk of a spurious correlation. Can you recommend a text or paper about this?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s